Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Brown VS Board of Education


Refkection: Separate but Unequal

Schools are not separately segregated, but education is different based on poverty and class range. Their goal is to have low poverty and rich students into one school. "Studies have shown that it is not the race of the students that is significant, but rather the improved all-around environment of schools with better teachers, fewer classroom disruptions, pupils who are more engaged academically, parents who are more involved, and so on. The poorer students benefit from the more affluent environment. “It’s a much more effective way of closing the achievement gap,” said Mr. Kahlenberg." Here the author shows that based on race, poverty or enviorment you can't determine how effective their learning will be. We are no longer faced with segregation but in way throught the article, Herbet does show how education is seen as a way of separation but unequal. As a student from Central Falls, I can relate to this article because I grew up in a city with low poverty and a low education I can relate to this article because as a college student now, I realized how different the education I recieved compared to those who attended Saint Rays, or Cumberland High School. It would be great to see schools trying to make an effort to allow students from low poverty schools transfer to recieve the same education. Just because they are from a low poverty area does not mean that limits their ability to learn at the same level those who are in middle class schools. It would be great to see changes. Based on the videos, and the website of Brown VS the Board of Education, we can see we have come a long way based on the pictures shown on the website and how hard we have tried to get to where we are now. Tim Wise makes a great point about how President Obama is in a hard place. Racism has not changed. It is a start but we as a society have alot to do. It will take a while to get where we hope to be, but hopefully it can all work out.

5 comments:

Unknown said...

I think an important point that you make is that being from a low income home or community does not make children any less smart. There are reasons they don't do as well in school, and the biggest one is that they are not given the same tools as schools that have more money. If a kid can't afford a computer, they are at a disadvantage compared to other kids that can.

Nathan Ryan said...

Great use of your own personal experience to communicate and relate the argument presented to yourself. This is definitely an issue that needs to be brought to attention and addressed because although public education is free, it seems like those that have the money for a better education live in areas where the free education is better than the free education in poverty stricken areas.

Unknown said...

Children should be given every possible opportunity to achieve their maximum potential. I completely agree with you, children from lower poverty neighborhoods should be allowed to transfer to a different school based on their academic standings. Besides, it's not their faults that they live where they do. It's cool that you have a first hand testimony to that. I know that at Narragansett, if you were interested in vocation, we have a partnership with Charlestown where they allow Narragansett residents to attend their vocational school. The Narragansett school system would even provide transportation to and from Chariho's vo-tech. Thats just an example on how a school or district should provide it's students with various opportunities.

Unknown said...

It is so unfair for children in low income schools. Many don't have a way out to be able to go to a wealthier school. Students from wealthier schools have such a higher unfair advantage, with the most up to date technology and textbooks, while low income students are looked down upon because where they come from.

Unknown said...

I have noticed the school segregation in my own placement school. Most of the students who go there are of low-income and it's sad that the students have no control over it and yet they are forced into an education that is not as good as upper-class schools